The Biggest Control Weakness in Every Company

 The Biggest Control Weakness in Every Company

It’s not weak systems. It’s not poor segregation of duties. It’s not careless employees. 👉 It’s the CEO. Here’s the truth nobody dares to write in an audit report: Controls only work if leadership chooses to respect them. ⚠️ Procurement rules vanish with a CEO override. ⚠️ HR policies bend when “star performers” are involved. ⚠️ Financial discipline collapses when the boss says: “Just book it.” And yet—most audits, risk reports, even board papers never say it. Why? Because calling out the CEO feels like career suicide. But history doesn’t lie: ➡️ Enron. ➡️ Satyam. ➡️ Wirecard. None collapsed because a “reconciliation failed.” They collapsed because CEOs overrode every control. The paperwork looked fine. The culture was rotten. So here’s the uncomfortable governance question: 👉 If the CEO is the ultimate control weakness, who is holding them accountable? Audit Committees? Too soft. Boards? Too close. Risk Teams? Too dependent. Until we admit: “Leadership override is the #1 systemic risk” — every other control is theatre. 🔥 Auditors, risk managers, governance professionals — what do you think? Would you dare to document “CEO override” as the highest risk? Or is that still unspoken… because survival comes first?

Comments

  1. AnonymousSeptember 10, 2025 at 9:11 PM

    True. We need to accept the weakness if exists in any Organisation

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Key Highlights of Section 194T:

Key Highlights of Section 194T: ✅ Effective from: April 1, 2025 ✅ Who needs to deduct TDS? Firms & LLPs ✅ Threshold Limit: ₹20,000 per financial year (Aggregate) ✅ TDS Rate: 10% (20% if PAN/Aadhaar not provided) ✅ Applicable on both working & non-working partners ✅ No exemption via Form 15G/15H or lower TDS certificate 🔹 Why is this important? Earlier, no TDS was required on such payments due to Section 40(b), but from April 1, 2025, firms/LLPs must deduct TDS before crediting or paying these amounts. This is a significant change impacting partnership firms, LLPs, and their partners. Firms must now ensure TDS compliance to avoid disallowance under Section 40(a).
Read more

My CA Journey summary

  Chartered Accountancy (CA)  is one of the most popular   professional courses . It is one of the Toughest courses in the world. It requires an integration of intelligence, hard work , Patience, Determination and continuous dedication with non-stop efforts.  Many aspirants relinquish this challenging journey and replace their dreams with  some other career options . My CA journey mentioned  below in  short summary: If I can become a Chartered Accountant anyone CAN. I Came from a village background with Telugu medium upto graduation. After graduating, I was confused as to what I should do. My Big Brother wanted me to pursue CA so that I have a degree, which would help me get a basic job and the required financial support in the future. That is when I decided to study further and become a Chartered Accountant. Initial period of my CA journey I was faced with a little bit of a medium issue, however I was able to clear the 1st 2 stages of CA early by spen...
Read more

GST on Corporate Guarantee

GST on Corporate Guarantee : one company (let’s say Company H) provided a corporate guarantee to a Bank or Financial institutions on behalf of its related entity, Company S . Since Company H and Company S are related persons under GST law, the question arises: ➡ Is a Corporate Guarantee taxable under GST? ➡ If yes, on what value should it be taxed, considering it is provided free of cost? Analysis As per Section 7(1)(c) read with Para 3 of Schedule I of the CGST Act, 2017, any supply of goods or services between related persons or distinct persons, made in the course or furtherance of business, is deemed a supply even without consideration. Further, Rule 28(2) of the Valuation Rules, 2017, provides that the value of a Corporate Guarantee shall be determined as: ✅ 1% per annum of the guaranteed amount (irrespective of whether the loan is partly or fully utilized) OR ✅ Actual consideration charged (if any) Whichever is higher However, as per the proviso under Rule 28, if the recip...
Read more